Case Report Review with Annotated Bibliography

Annotated Bibliography Assignment help

The following levels of criteria will be used to grade this assessment task:
Part A

Criterion 1: Working individually, research, identify and create a bibliography of 6 citations of sourceswhich will include book chapters, articles, and reports relevant to the chosen topic.

Criterion 2: For each citation in your bibliography, develop an annotation of one paragraph (150-200words) which describes and evaluates the citation. The purpose of this annotation is to inform thereader of the relevance, accuracy, and quality of the sources cited

Criterion 3: Use the Harvard Referencing Style for each source.

Criterion 4: Ensure that each of your annotations includes a summary of the arguments and/or findings,and evaluation of the arguments and evidence provided.

Criterion 5: Your Annotated Bibliography is expected to form part of your refence list for Part B of thisassessment.

Part B

Criterion 1: Working in a group of 3, select ONE case study from the list provided.

Criterion 2: This case analysis has to be critiqued using academic peer-reviewed journals. You willneed minimum 6 annotated references (Part A) from the academic peer-reviewed journals to critiqueand they need to be current ranging from 2012 – current. In addition, you can use older references.There is no limit to this.

Criterion 3: Write a case analysis that highlights your insights and understanding of the ethical issuesinvolved in that particular business real-world situation.

Criterion 4: You must apply relevant theory in support of your views.

Criterion 5: Recommendations for action and/or alternative solutions should be presented

Criterion 6: Use the Harvard referencing system. The reference section should list alphabetically eachreference cited in the body of your essay.

Criterion 7: Length is 1200 words +/- 10%

Criterion 8: Submit your Case Analysis (Word or PDF formats) in the allocated Dropbox on VUCollaborate

Part C
Describe:

Purposeful Contextualisation Analysis of what is known in the light of experience andtheory. – 20%

Examine:
Personal development / Assessment of learning to development of existing knowledge,emotions, values, and beliefs – 20%

Contemplate:

Action and Implication Synthesising future learning actions/options/ solutions/strategies to facilitate change – 30%
Articulation, presentation, structure, expression and referencing (Harvard Style) – 30%
Overall summary of quality and depth of reflection – 100%