Your assignment is to conduct a usability evaluation of another teams design.
This assignment is the second of the team assignment for this subject. The rationale for this assignment
Is that you are part of a team of expert reviewers who have been tasked to evaluate a design for usability issues.
Team Member Responsibilities:
Each team member will be assessed on:
•The final usability evaluation presented by the team;
•The individual contributions that they have made to the usability evaluation. This will be shown by the entries that they have made in the Team Interact Forum.
Team members should note that:
•A total of 50% of the overall marks for this assignment are for individual contributions. Marks will be allocated for:
oThe usability evaluation of the design (50%), and
oIndividual team member contributions to the usability evaluation (50%)
•A team member who cannot show evidence of any individual contributions in the Team Forum will be regarded as having not contributed to the evaluation. This will result in no marks being awarded to that team member for this assignment.
1. The team will be required to evaluate a design for usability issues.
2. The team can use either the Nielsen & Mulish heuristic or the DECIDE framework for the usability evaluation.
3. The team will submit a 3-5 page report which details:
o 1. The design evaluated;
o 2. The heuristic or framework being used for the evaluation.
o 3. Each heading in the heuristic or framework should be listed followed by a discussion of the related issues found on the Mobile App. This should include:
1. What the issue is and where is it located
2. Why the issue is a problem;
3. Whether the issue is a significant or a minor issue
4. Possible remediation actions that could resolve the issues found.
5.Indicate in your team forum the reasoning behind your evaluation decisions. This reasoning must demonstrate input from each member of the team.
Your team evaluation will be given to the team responsible for the design. Your team should ensure that:
•The usability evaluation is as accurate as possible;
•Your evaluation is not overly negative or derogatory. You need to think and act as a team of professional designers and provide commentary that is designed to assist the team to improve their design;
This assessment aligns with the following learning outcomes of this subject:
•be able to evaluate an interface to determine its effective usability and identify enhancements for improvement;
•be able to design a set of appropriate usability tests for a given interface;
•be able to interpret and evaluate usability testing results to plan interface improvements;
•be able to design a user interface to meet a given set of requirements;
Question HD DI CR PS FL
Use a usability heuristic to evaluate a design (30 marks) Comprehensive heuristic based evaluation that covers all aspects of the design. It identifies all issues, and determines why they are an issue. Thorough heuristic based evaluation that covers most aspects of the design. It identifies most issues, and determines why they are an issue. Detailed heuristic based evaluation that covers many aspects of the design. It identifies many issues, and determines why they are an issue. Adequate heuristic based evaluation that covers some aspects of the design. It identifies some issues Incomplete or irrelevant heuristic evaluation that ignores or does not comment on most of the issues
Discuss the remediation of the usability issues discovered (20 marks) Comprehensive discussion of the remediation of all issues discovered; In-depth interpretation of discoveries where conclusions and are directly drawn from the evaluation conducted is explicitly included. Thorough discussion of the remediation of most issues discovered including evidence of drawing interpretation from evaluation Good discussion of remediation of many issues discovered including some evidence of drawing interpretation from evaluation Adequate discussion of remediation of some issues discovered including some evidence of drawing interpretation from evaluation Incomplete or irrelevant discussion of the remediation of any issues discovered
Interaction on forum (10 marks) Student is actively engaging
in innovative approaches to
peer interaction that foster
deeper collaboration and co-construction
of new knowledge Student is actively co-constructing
their peers through cooperation
and collaboration Students is interacting
with peers with evidence of collaboration & moderation; engaging with discussion topics posed by peers Some evidence of student
Interaction, with student responding to peers on the
discussion board No evidence of interaction on forums.
Quality of forum interaction (10 marks) Proactively initiates and facilitates discussion, explicitly using appropriate
Strategies and tools.
Initiates and facilitates
appropriate strategies and
Evidence that there is some engagement on the topics with peers in the forums. Some evidence of responding to questions or topics on the discussion forum.
No evidence of interaction on forums.
Contribution to evaluation (30 marks) Proactively initiates and facilitates discussion on evaluation issues and remediation actions Initiates and facilitates discussion on evaluation issues and remediation actions Evidence of a continued engagement with peers but suggests few solutions. Some evidence of responding to questions on issues, but not involved in developing solution
No evidence of interaction on forums.
Presentation, spelling and grammar (-5 marks) Up to 5 marks may be deducted for poor presentation, spelling and grammar
ITC504 |Team Evaluation and User Interface | Assignment help
In this academic paper, student is required to carry out the usability evaluation of the team design. This is actually the second team assignment for the subject. You are a part of a reviewing team and have been assigned the task to carry out the evaluation of a design for the issues related to its usability. It is a team task where the members have to first assess the design for the issues of usability. For the purpose of evaluation, team members can either utilize the Nielsen & Molich heuristic or DECIDE framework. Then 3 to 5 pages report has to be submitted.
Order from our assignment help company and unburden yourself from all your academic work
Are you facing challenges in solving your ITC504|Team Evaluation| User Interface assignment? Then you can take the academic assistance from our experts who are well versed in writing the subject projects, solving subject homework and delivering it ahead of the submission dates. Our team makes sure that your projects are written in a highly proficient manner. The team also helps the students to improve their knowledge and understanding about the concepts that are involved. Our college homework help service is extremely reliable, affordable and students get the full value of the money. So, order from our company and get ready to unburden yourself from all your academic work.
Leave A Comment