PROJ6000 Principles of Project Management Assignment Help
|
ASSESSMENT BRIEF |
|
|
Subject Code and Title |
PROJ6000 Principles of Project Management |
|
Assessment |
Assessment 2 – Project Selection Methods and Initial Documents |
|
Individual/Group |
Individual |
|
Length |
1500 words |
|
Learning Outcomes |
Successful completion of this assignment will result in achievement of the following subject learning outcomes:
1. Understand PMBOK knowledge areas and process groups and their role, relevance and impact on project management best practice and PMI’s Code of Ethics. 2. Critically compare and contrast project management approaches and their appropriateness for managing a variety of project types. 3. Apply appropriate project management tools and techniques, paying particular attention to risk management. |
|
Submission |
By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Module 3 |
|
Weighting |
35% |
|
Total Marks |
35 Marks |
Context:
A project is a temporary endeavour undertaken to provide an expected and beneficial outcome. A project life cycle is the series of phases that a project passes through from its initiation to its closure. Project goals should align with organisational goals such as improved operations or increased revenues, reducing costs or improving efficiencies.
Before resources can be committed to a project, the reason for its proposal and the benefits it is expected to deliver need to be understood by people in positions empowered to make decisions about the expenditure of an organisation’s resources. The selection of organisational projects is typically performed through a method of classification and review of the project’s business case. That method of course should be applied consistently to all project proposals.
Instructions:
For this assessment, you are required to demonstrate your knowledge on different methods used in the project selection and the project initiation process. Throughout the assessment, you will consider the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) guide and focus, more specifically, on the initiation documents.
Assessment 2: Project Selection Methods and Initiation Documents (35%)
In essay writing, use the given/approved project throughout this assessment.
As you have discovered in your learning resources, this assessment requires you to:
Carefully Identify and justify suitable project selection methods to the given project
Critically discuss the processes to conduct the above project selection methods.
Consider the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) and appropriately describe the initiation process group and project documents that are created or used as inputs for a new project.
Your assessment should contain 1500 words.
Output and Submission:
Submit your completed assessment by the end of Module 3.
The assessment will be graded using the Learning Rubrics below and is worth 35% of the total for the subject.
Learning Rubrics
| Assessment
Attributes |
Fail
(0-49) |
Pass
(50-64) |
Credit
(65-74) |
Distinction
(75-84) |
High Distinction
(85-100) |
| Evaluation of information selected to support the case study
10% |
Limited understanding of key concepts required to support the case study.
Confuses logic and emotion. Information taken from reliable sources but without a coherent analysis or synthesis.
Viewpoints of experts are taken as fact with little questioning. |
Resembles a recall or summary of key ideas.
Often conflates/confuses assertion of personal opinion with information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials.
Analysis and evaluation do not reflect expert judgement, intellectual independence, rigor and adaptability. |
Supports personal opinion and information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials.
Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. Identify logical flaws. Questions viewpoints of experts. |
Discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading.
Well demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts.
Viewpoint of experts are subject to questioning.
Analysis and evaluation reflect growing judgement, intellectual independence, rigor and adaptability. |
Systematically and critically discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading.
Information is taken from sources with a high level of interpretation/evaluation to develop a comprehensive critical analysis or synthesis. Identifies gaps in knowledge. Exhibits intellectual independence, rigor, good judgement and adaptability. |
| Correct citation
of key resources and evidence
10% |
Demonstrates inconsistent
use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. No justification provided on the connection between references and assessment contents. |
Demonstrates use of
credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed. Some justification provided on the connection between |
Demonstrates use of high
quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. Well justified the linkage and connection between references and assessment contents. |
Demonstrates use of good
quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and statements. Shows evidence of wide scope within the organisation for sourcing evidence. Excellent justification provided on the |
Demonstrates use of high-
quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and position statements. Shows evidence of wide scope within and without the organisation for sourcing evidence. Expertly justified |
|
There are mistakes in the APA style. |
references and assessment
contents.
There are no mistakes in the APA style. |
There are no mistakes in the
APA style. |
linkage and connection
between references and assessment contents.
There are no mistakes in the APA style. |
the connection and
validation between references and assessment contents.
There are no mistakes in the APA style. |
|
| Effective
Communication
30% |
Demonstrate lack of communication/participation on the topic when required (in class or online or both).
Written assignment is difficult to understand for audience, no logical/clear structure, poor flow of ideas, argument lacks supporting evidence.
Failed to explain logics and rationales in either written or verbal form when required. |
Demonstrate insufficient level of communication/participation on the topic when required (in class or online or both).
Information, arguments and evidence are presented in a way that is not always clear and logical. Line of reasoning is often difficult to follow.
Logics and rationales are vaguely explained in both written and verbal form when required. |
Demonstrate moderate level of communication/participation on the topic when required (in class or online or both).
Information, arguments and evidence are well presented, mostly clear flow of ideas and arguments. Line of reasoning is easy to follow.
Key information presented and decisions are drawn. General explanation provided to clarify logics and rationales if required. |
Demonstrate good level of communication/participation on the topic when required (in class or online or both).
Information, arguments and evidence are very well presented; the presentation is logical, clear and well supported by evidence.
Meaningful information presented to draw reasonable decisions. Logics and rationales are well explained in both written and verbal form if required. |
Demonstrate high level of communication/participation on the topic when required (in class or online or both).
Written assignment is expertly presented; the presentation is logical, persuasive, and well supported by evidence, demonstrating a clear flow of ideas and arguments.
Some raw data are being used to interpret meaningful information, and reasonable decisions are drawn. Logics and rationales are well explained in both written and verbal form if required. |
PROJ6000_assessment 2 brief.docx Page 5 of 6
| Knowledge and
understanding
50% |
Limited understanding of
required concepts and knowledge i.e. different project selection methods and applications, a business case and the differing uses of a SoW.
Key components of the assignment are not addressed. |
Knowledge or understanding
of the field or discipline (different project selection methods and applications, a business case and the differing uses of a SoW). Resembles a recall or summary of key ideas.
Often conflates/confuses assertion of personal opinion with information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. |
Thorough knowledge or
understanding of the field or discipline/s (different project selection methods and applications, a business case and the differing uses of a SoW).
Supports personal opinion and information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials.
Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. |
Highly developed
understanding of the field or discipline/s (different project selection methods and applications, a business case and the differing uses of a SoW).
Discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading.
Well demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. |
A sophisticated
understanding of the field or discipline/s (different project selection methods and applications, a business case and the differing uses of a SoW).
Systematically and critically discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading.
Mastery of concepts and application to new situations/further learning. |
PROJ6000 Sample, Principles of Project Management Solution, PROJ6000 Principles of Project Management Expert
Leave A Comment