Subcode — MGT603 Assignment Help
Title — Systems Thinking Assignment Help
File Type — Individual
Part A: Proposal Individual
Part B: Critique
Words limit — Part A: One (1) Original Post (maximum 500 words)
Part B: Two (2) Critiques, Each critique max. 250 words
References — APA, at least 3 academic-related, at least 2 other
Learning outcome — evaluate the paradigms of Systems Thinking conceptualization and its application
Part – A
Please review the list of case organizations on MGT603 Blackboard.
List of case organisations
- Event Cinemas
- T2 tea
choose ONE case organization from list.
Read and research widely on the selected case organization
prepare and post in the Discussion Forum at least ONE original post identifying intended or unintended consequences
Key points to consider
proposal should be “holistic”
consider tools such as Rich Picture and CATWOE
number all sections and sub-sections
All inserted Figures and Tables require being labelled and numbered appropriately
provide a brief rational of why use of Systems Thinking is important
write in the “third person”
original posts are submitted in the MGT603 Assessment 1 (Part A) Discussion Forum
Part — B
Your Critique should include commentary on:
Please identify missing components, if any, and provide constructive feedback.
Have all plausible consequences been identified?
Have Systems Thinking tools been used and used properly? Please provide a critique of these tools and their use in solving the identified problem.
Please make sure to highlight the authors of the chosen posts.
Please ensure to submit (Part B) in the related Discussion Forum
Key points to consider
Please feel free to post more than what is specified to broaden your understanding and appreciation of the topic.
required to support claims either with the relevant experience or with the published literature
The views could be supporting comments and feedback, or they may be a
contradiction, but you need to provide appropriate justification as specified above.
If you can provide appropriate articles to support an opinion, it will be valued considerably.
Provide responses, which are relevant and add value to the discussion. The quality of response will be considered as one of the most important criteria for evaluating students
Knowledge and understanding (technical and theoretical knowledge)
Understands theoretical models and concepts (25%)
Context, Audience and Purpose (25%)
Analysis and application with synthesis of new knowledge (25%)
Effective Communication (15%)
Correct citation of key resources and evidence (10%)